“If you DO use hymnals for congregational singing, why do you view them as a worthwhile means of leading your church in worship?”
Here was my response:
A printed hymnal is good for so many reasons.
It is a canon of acceptable worship. It helps congregants know what is good to sing in worship (and, by converse, helps them judge what should NOT be sung in worship). A church that uses slides misses this. Everything is fair game, and it gives less direction to the people as to what is acceptable.
Even the most “Western” hymnal of 75 years ago is far more multicultural and diverse and catholic than the narrow window of junk from Nashville that churches are singing today.
The hymnals we use (Cantus Christi & Hymns to the Living God) include hymn and hymn texts from several continents, many nations, several different centuries.
Hymnals are a window into church history.
Hymnals are an excellent and extremely portable devotional book.
I don’t how families sing hymns together without hymnals, as they’re also an excellent tool for family worship.
Hymnals perpetuate a tradition of excellent musical culture in Christian churches, and excellent musical culture is necessary to fulfill the Apostolic command to sing to the glory of God. Churches that care about obedience to Christ should care about the way in which they go about singing. Hymnals help believers sing in parts, and so the music is more beautiful and stirring.
Hymnals help us remember the words.
They help us see the way the different stanzas fit together way better than slides.
I thank God for hymnals.
To this I’d add:
Hymnals teach us what is right and fitting for us to offer to God in worship.
A good hymnal is an excellent way to learn the right way to express affection for God.
Well organized hymnals help us find hymns suitable for different kinds of expressions of worship.
Certainly I’m missing other reasons. If you prefer hymnals, why?